Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

U.K. Rejects Donald Trump’s Call for Nigel Farage to Be Made Ambassador

Video
bars
0:00/0:41
-0:00

transcript

Britain Says ‘No Vacancy’ for Ambassador

Boris Johnson, the British foreign secretary, rejected President-elect Donald J. Trump’s suggestion that Nigel Farage should be the British ambassador to the United States.

N/A

Video player loading
Boris Johnson, the British foreign secretary, rejected President-elect Donald J. Trump’s suggestion that Nigel Farage should be the British ambassador to the United States.CreditCredit...Yana Paskova/Getty Images

LONDON — Once again, President-elect Donald J. Trump seems to have gone out of his way to embarrass the British government.

After Election Day, he spoke with nine other leaders before taking a call from Prime Minister Theresa May and then told her casually, “If you travel to the U.S., you should let me know.”

In a Monday night Twitter post, just as the British government was reaching out to Mr. Trump to reaffirm the “special relationship” with the United States that Britons prize, he suggested the appointment of Nigel Farage, the interim leader of Britain’s populist, anti-immigrant U.K. Independence Party, as ambassador to the United States.

The prime minister’s office quickly dismissed the recommendation, telling reporters: “There is no vacancy. We have an excellent ambassador to the U.S.” in Kim Darroch, a former national security adviser.

Mr. Farage, a staunch backer of Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union and an outspoken supporter of Mr. Trump, is better known at home for his fiery speeches than for his diplomatic skills.

He appeared on the campaign trail with Mr. Trump and inspired the candidate to promise his supporters a “Brexit plus plus plus,” referring to the June 23 referendum in Britain to leave the European Union.

Mr. Farage, whose party is a right-wing rival and irritant to Mrs. May’s Conservative Party, has struck up a warm friendship with Mr. Trump. Mr. Farage visited the president-elect in Manhattan on Nov. 12, four days after the election. A photo of the two men posing happily in front of a gold-plated elevator went viral.

Still, few expected Mr. Trump to trample on the normal rules of diplomatic protocol by suggesting in public that the British government should make his political ally its envoy to the United States.

That is exactly what Mr. Trump did in his Twitter post, in which he said, “Many people would like to see @Nigel_Farage represent Great Britain as their Ambassador to the United States. He would do a great job!”

Diplomats were quick to criticize Mr. Trump for overstepping diplomatic bounds.

“Now Trump tweets that he wants Nigel Farage as UK Ambassador to the US,” Carl Bildt, a former prime minister and foreign minister of Sweden, said on Twitter. “Slightly original, to put it very mildly. No business of his.”

Mr. Farage himself described the comments from Mr. Trump as a “bolt from the blue,” but added that “if I could help the U.K. in any way I would.”

For Mrs. May, the intervention comes at a time when her government has been working to bolster its contacts with the transition team around the president-elect.

Britain has long prized its special ties to the United States and its role as a trusted security and intelligence partner; it is more eager than ever to improve those connections.

With Britain committed to leaving the European Union, which has a single market of about 500 million people, the government hopes to strike new trade deals around the world and has high hopes of one with the United States.

On Monday, Mrs. May’s office confirmed that an invitation to Mr. Trump to pay a full state visit to Britain was under consideration.

Yet Mrs. May’s government has struggled to establish relations with the Trump transition team after some senior British political figures harshly criticized him during the campaign. For example, when Mr. Trump was pursuing the Republican nomination, Boris Johnson, then the mayor of London, accused Mr. Trump of being “out of his mind” and of possessing “a quite stupefying ignorance” that made him unfit for the presidency.

Mr. Johnson, now the foreign secretary, has changed his tune, telling a Czech newspaper that Mr. Trump is a “dealmaker, he is a guy who believes firmly in values that I believe in too — freedom and democracy. As far as I understand he is in many aspects a liberal guy from New York.”

In December 2015, Mrs. May, herself, criticized Mr. Trump’s call for a ban on Muslims entering the United States, saying it was “divisive, unhelpful and wrong.”

In Twitter posts before the presidential election, two of her close aides, who are now joint chiefs of staff, disparaged Mr. Trump’s campaign. Fiona Hill described Mr. Trump as a “chump,” while Nick Timothy greeted suggestions that Conservatives should reach out to him with the word “urgh.”

Mark Leonard, director of the European Council on Foreign Relations, a research institute, noted that Mr. Trump had criticized the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, during his election campaign and that “his relationship with Europe’s two most powerful women is complicated.”

He added that the British diplomatic service was well connected with its American counterpart, and therefore is part of the establishment that Mr. Trump and Mr. Farage have railed against. “By blowing a raspberry at Theresa May, and at official British foreign policy advances, Mr. Trump can also sideline the American foreign policy establishment that was so hostile to his election,” Mr. Leonard said.

In an op-ed article published on Tuesday on Breitbart News, the far-right website once run by Stephen K. Bannon, who is now Mr. Trump’s chief strategist, Mr. Farage denounced the British government, saying its leaders had not yet absorbed the lessons of Brexit and the Trump victory.

“Those who supported Remain now hold senior positions,” Mr. Farage said, referring to opponents of Brexit, including Mrs. May and Philip Hammond, the chancellor of the Exchequer. “Worst still, those who were openly abusive about Trump now pretend to be his friend.

“It is career politics at its worst, and it is now getting in the way of the national interest.”

Gerry Gunster, the chief executive of Goddard Gunster, a Washington public affairs firm that advised the Leave campaign in the Brexit vote, encouraged the prime minister’s office to figure out how to make use of Mr. Farage, saying, “Any kind of role for Nigel would be beneficial to the United Kingdom.”

“It’s clear that he and Mr. Trump have a relationship that you would think, in some capacity, Downing Street would be able to use and put politics aside,” said Mr. Gunster, an American who was among a small group of Brexit campaigners who accompanied Mr. Farage to his postelection meeting with Mr. Trump.

Appointing Mr. Farage to such a high-profile and politically sensitive position would almost certainly be a step too far for the government, however, given his status in Britain.

When the idea of using Mr. Farage’s friendship with Mr. Trump as a diplomatic tool was suggested earlier this month, the first minister of Wales, Carwyn Jones, said it would be like “giving a child a chain saw.”

Danny Hakim contributed reporting.

A version of this article appears in print on  , Section A, Page 18 of the New York edition with the headline: Britain Says ‘No Thanks’ to Advice on Envoy to U.S.. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT