2019.10.14
VIKING EXPANSION IN THE EAST
BY DENIS SUKHINO-KHOMENKO (DOKTORAND I HISTORIA)
DENIS.SUKHINO-KHOMENKO@GU.SE
Suggested extracurricular literature
2019.10.14
• Christiansen, Eric. 2002. The Norsemen in the Viking Age, 214–235. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing. (NB: requires a level of factual knowledge before reading!)
• Franklin, Simon and Shepard, Jonathan. 1996. The Emergence of Rus 750–1200. New
York: Longman. (NB: the book’s date!)
• Jones, Gwyn. 1968. A History of the Vikings, 241–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(NB: a very classical style, no easy-read for an unprepared reader; some hypotheses
outdated!)
• Haywood, John. 2015. Northmen: The Viking Saga 793–1241 AD, 164–209, 314–321
London: Head of Zeus. (NB: a very old-school and syncretic narrative!)
• Hedenstierna-Jonson, Charlotte. 2009. “Rus’, Varangians, and Birka Warriors.” In The
Martial Society: Aspects of Warriors, Fortifications and Social Change in Scandinavia,
edited by Lena Holmquist Olausson and Michael Olausson, 159–178. Stockholm:
Archaeological Research Laboratory, Stockholm University.
• Lönnroth, Lars. 2014. “From History to Myth. The Ingvar Stones and Yngvars Saga
Viðfǫrla.” In Nordic Mythologies: Interpretations, Intersections, and Institutions, edited by
Timothy R. Tangherlini, 100–114. Berkley; Los Angeles: North Pinehurst Press.
• Svanberg, Fredrik. 2003. Decolonizing the Viking Age 1. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell
International.
2019.10.14
Regional expansion: a structural overview
In the East, the Viking expansion
could be traced in three main
cultural (!) regions. They do not
necessarily belong east in the
geographical sense, and it is
often hard to delineate one from
another:
• The Islamic world,
• The eastern Slavic territories,
• The Byzantine empire.
(↑ The Viking expansion in the East)
The question of the day: what and why is common and different between the Viking
expansion in the East and the West?
The Viking expansion in the
Mediterranean: the 9th century
2019.10.14
(↓ Viking raids in the Mediterranean, after: Haywood, John. 1995. The Penguin Historical Atlas of the Vikings, 48–9. London: Penguin Books)
• 844: Vikings (alMajus) sail along
Iberian west coast,
pillaging Galicia and
Asturias; capture
Gijón, Lisbon,
and Seville; defeated
by King Ramiro I
at La Coruña and
badly by the Emir of
Cordoba near
Seville.
• 859–860: Bjǫrn and Hastein raid Galicia, Asturias, and the Cordoba Emirate; meet
resistance until Algeciras, then enter the Mediterranean; first encounter with the blámenn
(“blue men”, presumably Africans); raid Iberian east coast; sack Luna, mistaking it for
Rome, then Pisa and Fiesole; presumably carry on to the Byzantine Empire (?).
• 861–862: Bjǫrn and Hastein return west, losing 40 of their 60 ships to the emir’s fleet at
Gibraltar; raid Navarre and ransom King Garcia I for 308 kg of gold; Bjǫrn later dies in
Frisia, Hastein joins the “great heathen army” in England.
The Viking expansion in the
Mediterranean: the 10–11th centuries
2019.10.14
(↓ Norman campaigns in the Central Mediterranean, after: Bennet, Matthew, and Nicholas Hooper. 1996. Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare:
The Middle Ages 768–1487, 83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
•
•
•
•
• Raids in Iberia: repelled
in 889, 912–13, 966, and
971; the survivors of the 889
raid were settled in the
countryside of Seville: the
only known Scandinavian
colony in Spain.
• 1017: first Normans hired as
mercenaries in the local
wars.
• 1030: first Norman county
of Aversa founded.
1047: Robert Guiscard of Hauteville arrives in Italy from Normandy, later joined by his
brothers Roger and Richard.
1072: the Hauteville brothers conquer the Lombard duchies, drive the Byzantines out of
Italy, and invade Sicily;
1091: Roger finishes the conquest of Sicily;
1190–94: the German emperor Henry VI conquers the Kingdom of Sicily.
The Scandinavians and the eastern Slavs
2019.10.14
(↓ Scandinavian influence in the Eastern Baltic and Russia; after: Graham-Campbell, James, and Batey, Colleen. 1994.
The Cultural Atlas of the Viking World, 189. New York: Facts on File)
•
Mid-7th century: a Scandinavian colony at Grobiņa (western Latvia) established.
•
Mid-8th century: [Staraya] Ladoga (ON
Aldeigja, Aldeigjuborg) founded; Scandinavian
presence almost immediately.
First half of the 9th century: Gorodishche
(“former town”), 2 km of modern Novgorod,
founded; considered to be the Novgorod of
the Primary Chronicle for this period.
839: first mentioning of the people of Rhos in
the Annales Bertiniani: “…qui se, id est
gentem suam, Rhos vocari dicebant, quos rex
illorum chacanus vocabulo… Imperator…
comperint, eos gentis esse Sueonum” […who
claimed to be called, i.e. their people, Rhos,
whose king is called chacanus… The emperor
[Louis the Pious] understood that they were of
the people of Sueones].
860: first recorded siege of Constantinople by
the people of Ῥῶς (Rhôs). The first
supposedly successful Christian mission to
the Rhôs.
•
•
•
The Scandinavians and the eastern Slavs
2019.10.14
(Rus’ trade and military activity in the 9th – early 10th centuries; after: Markov, Nikolay (ed.) 2012. Rus in the 9–10th
Centuries: An Archaeological Panorama 15, ed. by Nikolay Markov. Moscow: Drevnosti Severa ↓).
c. mid-9th century: Descriptio civitatum
et regionum ad septentrionalem
plagam Danubii (a.k.a. “Bavarian
Geographer”) locates certain Ruzzi
somewhere between the Khazars and
the Magyars.
• 862: semi-legendary Rurik (*Hrø̄rīkʀ)
and two of his brothers “and all the
Rus” are invited “from across the sea”
to rule the Novgorodian Slavs and
surrounding Finno-Ugric tribes.
• no later than the 880s (possibly c.
840?): Ibn Khurradadhbih
mentions ar-Rūs traders (a “type
of aṣ-Ṣaqāliba”, i.e. Slavs) in Baghdad
and Khazaria.
• 882: Oleg (Helgi) annexes Kiev, kills its princes Askold (Hǫskuldr) and Dir (Dyri), former Rurik’s
men; they could have led the raid of 860 (866 in the Russian Primary Chronicle)
• 907/911: Oleg’s raid against Constantinople culminates in a Russo-Byzantine trade treaty.
• 922: Ahmed Ibn Fadlan, the ambassador of Caliph al-Muqtadir to the Volga Bulghar, leaves the
first detailed ethnographic description of the Rus.
•
The
Scandinavians
and
the
eastern
Slavs
↓
2019.10.14
( A Rus merchant’s prayer according to Ibn Fadlan; after: Kalinina, T.M., et al. (eds.). 2009. Ancient Rus in the Light of
the Foreign Sources, 3:67. Moscow: Russian Fund of Scientific Collaboration)
(← Oleg’s campaign and siege of
Constantinople, from the 15thcentury Radzivill chronicle, fol. 15r)
(↑ Arabic coins or imitations, after:
Rus in the 9–10th Centuries 2012:
375)
(Rurik grants Askold
and Dir to travel to
Constantinople,
from the 15thcentury Radzivill
chronicle, fol. 9r →)
(← Early medieval Novgorod,
after: Graham-Campbell and
Batey 1994: 192)
The Scandinavians and the eastern Slavs
2019.10.14
(Vladimir’s golden coin; after: Rus in the 9–10th Centuries 2012: 402 ↓).
•
941/944: an unsuccessful raid by prince Igor (Yngvarr) leads to a less favourable
treaty for the Rus.
• 943/944: the Rus raid Barda in the Caucasus on the Caspian Sea; the raid is led
by one H-l-g-w (probably Helgi); after an initial success the Rus are defeated.
• 945–965: the reign of princess Olga (Helga), first official Russian Christian ruler;
Olga personally visits Constantinople in c. 957 and meets the emperor who also
becomes her godfather.
• 965–972: prince Svyatoslav defeats Khazaria (966/7),
invades Bulgaria at the invitation of the Greek emperor
(967/8); retreats to Kiev to relieve the siege by the nomad
Pechenegs, returns to Bulgaria (969); forced to sign a
treaty with the new emperor; dies at the Dnieper rapids in
a Pecheneg ambush.
• 988: prince Vladimir officially baptises
(Yaroslav’s daughters, a contemporary Kievan fresco ↑; after: Melnikova, Elena, and
Russia, having married a Greek
Petrukhin, Vladimir (eds.). 2014. Ancient Rus in the Medieval World: An Encyclopaedia, 920.
princess.
Moscow: Ladomir)
• 1019–1054: the reign of prince Yaroslav the Wise; Yaroslav is the last Russian prince to be
actively involved in the Scandinavian politics; he married Ingigerðr, the daughter of the Swedish
king Óláfr Skötkonung; his daughter later marries the Norwegian king, Harald Hardrada;
Yaroslav is involved into the political struggle of the 1020–30s in the North and is the last major
employer for the Scandinavian mercenaries in Russia.
The Scandinavians and the eastern Slavs
(↑ Novgorod according to the Vikings, produced by the History Channel):
NOPE!
2019.10.14
The Scandinavians and the eastern Slavs
(↑ Virtual Gnëzdovo in the vicinity of modern-day Smolensk in the 10th century)
2019.10.14
Yngvarr víðfǫrli’s expedition to Serkland
and Garðaríki
•
2019.10.14
Yngvarr the Far-Travelled must have been a historical figure. Main sources:
o Yngvars saga víðfǫrla: one of the fornaldarsǫgur, supposedly recorded in the 12th century
(actual text 300 years younger);
o 26 runestones mention people who died “with Yngvarr” in the East (Austrvegr/Serkland/
Garðaríki);
o independent narrative sources: the Russian Primary Chronicle (recorded before 1117),
Imam Al-Bayhaqi (994–1066), The Chronicle of Cartli (late 11th century); the Pregradnoe
cross (a probable 11th-century inscription).
• When and where exactly Yngvarr
travelled is a matter of debate.
The conventional dating is
between 1036 and 1041. The
two main versions are:
1. ← Byzantium and Asia
Minor (the “big river” is
Dnieper)
2. Caucasia and/or Middle
Asia (the “big river” is
Volga) →
At any rate, the expedition ended
in a disaster.
Haraldr Harðráði’s Varangian
↓
adventures
2019.10.14
( The career of Harald Hardrada, after: Haywood 1995: 116)
• Harald
Hardrada (born
c. 1015) was
perhaps the
most
spectacular
Viking in the
East. Main
biographical
events:
o 1031: flees east after Óláfr the Saint’s defeat at Stiklestaðir in 1030.
o 1031–34: serves the Russian prince Yaroslav as a mercenary.
o 1034–42: serves in the Byzantine empire in the Varangian guard (founded in 988); campaigns in
Asia Minor, the Mediterranean, Bulgaria; has to flee Constantinople back to Kiev.
o 1043/44: marries Yaroslav’s daughter Elizabeth (a.k.a. Ellisif).
o 1045: returns to Norway, becomes its co-ruler with King Magnus (son of Óláfr the Saint).
o 1047: rules Norway alone; wages war against the Danish King Sven Estridsen until 1064.
o 1066: together with the exile Earl Tostig attempts to conquer England; wins the Battle of Fulford
on September 20th but gets killed at the Battle at Stamford Bridge only five days later.
How to NOT write a national history, or
Did “Sweden found Russia”?
2019.10.14
One of the major problems related to the Scandinavian activity in Eastern Europe is the scarcity of
coherent contemporary sources coupled with ambiguous ethno-professional names. Hence the
problem of who the Ῥῶς, ar-Rūs, рѹсь were and how to separate the Russian and
Scandinavian histories proper.
SWEDEN !
•
•
•
•
•
•
Extreme Upplandocentrism up until the second half of
the 20th century, e.g.:
o In 1914, Henrik Schück (1855–1947) hypothesised
that the name Denmark comes from a parish
Danmark in the vicinity of Uppsala;
o In 1930, Jöran Sahlgren (1884–1971) claimed that
all of later medieval Sweden was conquered by a •
“hardened and strong race” of the inhabitants of a
small village Svia in Tiundaland.
Scandinavian presence in Russia is archaeologically and
onomastially undisputed.
•
Annales Bertiniani clearly equate the Rhos with the
Sueones.
Geographically, it is only logical that the Scandinavians
in Russia would come from Svealand.
That and Annales Bertiniani’s Rhos = Sueones yield
svear = Sueones = Ῥῶς/ar-Rūs/Rus, and the very name
“Rus” must have come from Roslagen in Uppland.
RUSSIA "
In 1749, Gerhard Müller (1705–1783) held a speech at
the Russian Academy of Sciences, in which he ascribed
all early Russian development to the Northmen. This
spawned a harsh response from Michael Lomonosov
(1711–1765) who completely discarded Rus’ northern
origin. The (anti-)Normanist polemics were born.
In the 1870s, Vilhelm Thomsen (1842–1927) derived the
name Rus from the Balto-Finnic *rōtsi < Old Swedish
*rōþ-s-karlar or *rōþs-mannar (“rowers”). Simultaneously,
anti-normanists derived “Rus” from various hydronyms in
present-day Russia (“folk etymology”).
In the late 1940s, Stalinist ideology forbade seeing any
positive influence from the West, and the anti-normanist
“theory” was revived. E.g. despite the linguistic
impossibility, Michael Tikhomirov (1889–1965) “firmly”
connected Rus with a small tributary of Dnieper, Ros’
(Рось), south of Kiev, and this became the “official”
version until the end of the Soviet period.
How to NOT write a national history, or
Did “Sweden found Russia”?
2019.10.14
The (anti-)Normanist polemics/debates of the Rus’ origins revolve not around the
9th century but about the 18th increasingly onwards!
SWEDEN !
(↑ A medal struck by King Charles XII after his victory at Narva in
1700, mocking the Russian tsar)
RUSSIA "
(Biblical character Samson ↑ ripping a lion’s (Lion is Sweden’s heraldic
mascot) mouth, mocking the Swedish king; Peterhof, 1735/1802)
How to NOT write a national history, or
Did “Sweden found Russia”?
2019.10.14
Did “Sweden found Russia”? Not in such formulation:
1. Neither “Sweden”, not “Russia” (especially in the modern sense!) were a thing in the 9th century.
2. Svear ≠ [modern] Swedes; the svear were one on the constituent tribal groups in the medieval
Swedish kingdom; the equation svear = Rus is too simplistic and appropriationist.
3. Rus was a rather polyethnic political unit, encompassing various eastern Slavonic and Finno-Ugric
tribes and interacting with many foreign cultures.
4. If (!) Rurik was a historical figure, he likely came from the Jutlandic royal house of the Skjǫldungar and
was the same Rorik that held Frisia in fief from Lothar and Louis the German in 841–73.
Did the Scandinavians contribute to the formation of the Russian state? More than so: their
cultural, military, commercial, and political influence is hard to underestimate. Similar precedents:
•
•
Francia: the Romano-Gaulish population was ruled by a Germanic tribe, the Franks; the Franks gave
modern France its name and first dynasty but were absorbed by the natives.
Bulgaria: the Slavic population of Mœsia was subjugated by a Turkic tribe, the Bulgars, in the 680s; the
Bulgars gave modern Bulgaria its first dynasty and name but were absorbed by the natives.
The impetus for the whole discussion:
•
•
•
aggressive/conservative nationalism;
ambiguity of original sources; relative late beginning of written history in both Sweden and Russia;
the modern-period “originomania”, “colonization”, and cultural appropriation of the past in the era of
romanticism.
The take-away of the day: history is complicated! Tribal names’ etymology ≠
ethnic/cultural/genetic/racial origin per se! The circulation of group names ≠ the history of the same
groups (or their modern descendants) per se! Modern national borders did not exist 1000 years ago!
Classwork
2019.10.14
• Assignment #1 (map work):
o On the map, using the pewter models, pencils, and pens, demonstrate the most important
events and processes of the Viking eastward expansion in your respective region (the Islamic
world, the eastern Slavic territories, the Byzantine empire); please, include the following:
essential dates, names, locations.
• Assignment #2 (individual conclusion):
o Summarise the end result of the Scandinavian expansion by the end of the Viking Age (c.
1050/1100 or later, depending on your respective region); please, include the the following:
subjective and objective contributing factors to the success/failure of the colony; interaction with
the local population and consequences for both it and the newcomers (supply with examples
wherever possible).
• Assignment #3 (general conclusion):
o Synthesis for all groups: summarise the overall character, process, effect, and outcome of the
Viking eastward expansion as a whole and briefly compare the three region.
• Assignment #4 (overall conclusion):
o Compare the east- and westward Viking expansion c. 800–1050: can we identify any
common features between these regions, and if so, what contributed to the (dis)similarities?
o Try extending your observations to answer the question: what can the Scandinavian expansion
as a case study tell us about the historical processes? (NB: avoid judgmental and/or evaluative
conclusions!) What does it all matter?