Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Working mother
Of those on zero-hours contracts, 55% are women. Photograph: Jdc/LWA-JDC/Corbis
Of those on zero-hours contracts, 55% are women. Photograph: Jdc/LWA-JDC/Corbis

In Britain's labour market 'flexibility' means letting employers off the hook

This article is more than 9 years old

The idea that zero-hours contracts somehow benefit staff is undermined by the fact so many people on them wish they weren’t

Zero-hours contracts are the ultimate expression of Britain’s “flexible” labour market. Deregulate the workforce, free up firms to hire and fire, and they will be less burdened by fixed costs, leaner and more competitive – and create more jobs. So went the post-Thatcherite consensus.

So now we have at least 697,000 workers in the economy who don’t know how many hours they’re going to be working from one week to the next, or sometimes even one day to the next. In theory, they might be footloose and fancy-free – using their spare time to launch a dotcom startup or gig with a band. Yet these workers, many of whom are juggling more than one zero-hours contract, according to the ONS (which explains why there are 1.8m of them) fit exactly the characteristics of the groups that usually do worst out of the labour market.

More than half of them are women – 55%, compared with 47% of the workforce as a whole; and more than a third of them are aged 16–24, compared with 12% of the wider workforce. If zero-hours working were a lifestyle choice, surely more of the workforce’s traditional winners would be doing it?

There’s a profound human cost here, of the kind detailed over the past decade by London Citizens’ living-wage campaign, which has been as much about the casualisation of jobs as poverty pay; but there’s also a price for the wider economy. These easy-come-easy-go workers are highly unlikely to build up the work skills they will need to take them through life; and their employers have little incentive to invest in training and equipping them.

Yet building up Britain’s “human capital” is critical to boosting our flagging productivity, and ensuring the economy can grow in the long-term, at a time when some experts fear we may be facing a period of stagnation. Our short-termist employers may need to lose a bit in efficiency, for all of us to gain in economic progress – and who knows, by offering their staff predictability and security, they may find they make gains in loyalty and productivity too.

More on this story

More on this story

  • More than 100 business leaders sign letter backing Tories

  • Give zero-hours workers regular contracts after 3 months – Miliband

  • Has David Cameron really created 1,000 jobs a day?

  • Mike Ashley 'too busy' to face MPs over zero-hours contracts

  • The Guardian view on zero-hours: the number that keeps getting bigger

  • Zero-hours contracts in four charts

  • Almost 700,000 people in UK have zero-hours contract as main job

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed